Court Exposes Deception in High-Profile National Security Case
A Hong Kong court has identified eight instances where media tycoon Jimmy Lai Chee-ying provided false testimony during his national security trial, according to local reports. The revelations underscore the legal consequences of actions deemed to threaten stability in China's Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR).
Key Falsehoods Uncovered
Lai concealed the political purpose of a 2020 U.S. trip while seeking bail modification, falsely claiming family and business motives. Evidence showed planned meetings with U.S. officials, which he admitted hiding due to 'political sensitivity.' Judges also disproved Lai's denial of ties to anti-China group IPAC, citing social media interactions with its co-founder.
Editorial Influence Revealed
Contrary to Lai's claim of issuing only two editorial directives to Apple Daily, court evidence demonstrated repeated instructions to shape protest coverage. Messages revealed direct involvement in mobilizing demonstrations and softening reports on legislative building storming in 2019.
Foreign Interference Links Exposed
The court established Lai's financial support for illegal 'primary elections' and connections with radical groups like the 'Lam Chau Team.' WhatsApp records proved Lai's awareness of U.S. sanction advocacy despite initial denials, while Apple Daily staff confirmed institutional support for his political talk shows.
Legal Accountability Emphasized
Justice Alex Lee Wan-tang noted Lai's pattern of 'convenient memory lapses' when confronted with evidence. The verdict reinforces the HKSAR's commitment to upholding national security laws while maintaining judicial independence, according to legal observers.
