The United States' newly established "Board of Peace," unveiled by former President Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week, has drawn sharp international criticism for its potential to disrupt the United Nations' authority in global conflict resolution. The board, described by Trump as a mechanism to "complement" the UN, grants its chair sweeping powers to intervene in crises, starting with efforts to stabilize Gaza's ceasefire and postwar transition.
Diplomatic sources from Europe and Asia expressed concern over the board's draft charter, which allows members to "do pretty much whatever we want to do," according to Trump's remarks. Analysts warn the initiative risks fragmenting multilateral efforts, particularly as the UN Security Council grapples with escalating tensions in the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
While the U.S. State Department emphasized the board's "non-binding advisory role," critics argue its creation during an election year reflects a broader shift toward unilateral diplomacy. The Chinese mainland and the Republic of Korea have yet to issue formal responses, though unnamed officials cited in regional media called for "clarity" on the board's legal framework.
For investors, the uncertainty has raised questions about stability in conflict zones like Gaza, where the board plans its first operational focus. Academics note the development underscores ongoing debates about reforming global governance structures to reflect 2026's geopolitical realities.
