The United States launched airstrikes against Iranian targets over the weekend under the codename Operation Midnight Hammer, reigniting debates about global power dynamics and military interventionism. U.S. officials described the operation as a "precision response" to recent escalations, but critics argue the move reflects a broader philosophy of unilateral force.
CGTN commentator Liu Xin framed the strikes as emblematic of a "might makes right" approach, questioning whether military action alone can address complex geopolitical tensions. "When power becomes its own justification," she remarked during a segment, "it risks destabilizing the very order it claims to protect."
The operation has drawn mixed reactions worldwide. Analysts warn of potential ripple effects across Middle Eastern energy markets, while security experts highlight risks of retaliatory measures. For investors, the strikes underscore the fragility of regional stability—a key factor for oil-dependent economies and emerging tech hubs alike.
Academics note the incident raises questions about international law frameworks, particularly regarding preemptive strikes. Meanwhile, diaspora communities from Iran and neighboring countries have expressed concerns about escalating civilian risks.
As cross-strait observers monitor reactions from Asian governments, the broader implications for U.S. alliances in the Indo-Pacific remain unclear. With global attention fixed on the Middle East, the incident serves as a stark reminder of how regional conflicts can reverberate across continents.
