The high-stakes antitrust trial between Google and the U.S. Justice Department has reached its conclusion, leaving U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta to decide a case that could redefine the digital landscape. The government’s landmark lawsuit alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained its dominance in web search and search advertising, potentially shaping the “future of the internet.”
Judge Grills Both Sides
During intense closing arguments, Judge Mehta questioned attorneys from both sides, delving into whether platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram are genuine competitors in the search advertising market. The central issue revolves around whether these social media platforms can be considered substitutes for search engines in attracting advertising dollars.
Government’s Argument on Monopoly Power
David Dahlquist, representing the Justice Department, argued that Google’s control over advertising revenue fuels its monopolistic power. He asserted that Google feels no real market pressure to innovate or adjust pricing, stating, “Only a monopolist can make a product worse and still make more money.”
Google’s Defense Highlights Competition
Google’s attorney, John Schmidtlein, countered that the company’s share of U.S. digital advertising revenue has been decreasing due to competition from rivals. He pointed to the advertising prowess of platforms like TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Amazon, emphasizing that advertisers have multiple avenues to reach audiences.
“Google is constrained by where the eyeballs are,” Schmidtlein argued, suggesting that advertisers can—and do—allocate their budgets across various platforms. He further stated that Google continues to innovate its search advertising products, questioning, “If Google is a monopolist, why improve anything? Why not just jack the price up?”
Allegations of Destroyed Evidence
An additional layer of complexity was introduced with accusations that Google intentionally destroyed internal documents relevant to the lawsuit. The government has asked Judge Mehta to presume that missing chats were unfavorable to Google. The judge scrutinized Google’s data preservation practices, questioning whether “some consequence” should follow for what he termed as “far from best practices.”
Implications for the Tech Industry
This case is the first in a series of legal challenges aimed at curbing the market power of leading technology companies. Filed during the administration of former President Donald Trump, the lawsuit sets a precedent for subsequent cases against other giants like Meta, Amazon, and Apple. The outcome could have far-reaching effects on how these companies operate and compete.
Awaiting a Landmark Decision
As Judge Mehta prepares his decision, the tech industry and legal observers worldwide watch closely. His ruling could potentially mandate changes to Google’s business practices, influencing not just the company but the entire digital advertising ecosystem.
Reference(s):
Google trial wraps up as judge weighs landmark U.S. antitrust claims
cgtn.com
