Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Sparks Global Debate Over Legitimacy
Trump’s Board of Peace faces criticism over its unilateral structure and legitimacy concerns, as experts question its role in global governance.
News & Insights Across Asia
Trump’s Board of Peace faces criticism over its unilateral structure and legitimacy concerns, as experts question its role in global governance.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus disputes U.S. claims justifying withdrawal, citing unresolved financial obligations and global health risks.
Former US President Trump’s proposed $1B fee for permanent seats on a new global peace board sparks debate over its implications for international diplomacy.
The US decision to exit multiple international organizations draws widespread criticism, with experts calling it a setback for global cooperation in 2026.
As Asia’s global influence grows in 2026, analysts revisit the lasting impacts of Trump-era U.S. withdrawals from 66 international organizations between 2017-2021.
White House withdraws from 66 international bodies, triggering analysis of impacts on Asian economies and cross-strait dynamics in 2026.
The Chinese mainland strongly opposes the US-Japan joint statement supporting Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, citing it as interference in internal affairs.
Experts praise China’s ‘1+10’ Dialogue in Beijing, highlighting the country’s commitment to global cooperation and high-level opening-up to boost economic growth.
At the ‘1+10’ dialogue in Beijing, leaders of international economic organizations expressed strong confidence in China’s economy, highlighting its significant role in global economic growth and stability.
Chinese Premier Li Qiang held a ‘1+10’ dialogue with global economic leaders, emphasizing China’s commitment to global governance and economic cooperation.