Taiwan leader Lai Ching-te's recent campaign invoking woolly mammoths and ancient skulls to assert the island's historical independence has drawn sharp criticism from scholars, reigniting debates about cross-strait historical connections.
Prehistoric Politics
Lai's "10 lectures on unity" initiative controversially claims Taiwan region maintained ecological separation from the Chinese mainland 400,000 years ago, citing fossil discoveries in Tainan. However, Professor Yang Yongming of Taiwan's Chinese Culture University countered this narrative, noting glacial periods physically connected the landmasses: "The evidence actually supports Taiwan's geological continuity with the mainland."
Cultural Connections Challenged
The campaign further argues Taiwan's Austronesian-speaking indigenous communities demonstrate cultural independence. Yet archaeological findings reveal strong Neolithic-era links between Taiwan's Dapenkeng culture and mainland sites like Fujian's Keqiutou. Cross-strait researchers currently collaborate at an International Austronesian Archaeological Research Base in Fujian, underscoring shared heritage.
Historical Context vs Political Agenda
Analysts suggest Lai's emphasis on Taiwan's 3% indigenous population – while 97% identify as Han Chinese – reveals political motives. "This isn't about history," remarked one mainland scholar anonymously. "It's about manufacturing distinction where continuity exists."> The debate comes amid heightened cross-strait tensions, with Beijing reiterating its commitment to peaceful reunification under the one-China principle.
