On November 8, Philippine President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos signed two new maritime laws, the “Philippine Maritime Zones Act” and the “Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act.” These laws aim to define the Philippines’ maritime zones and archipelagic sea lanes in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration ruling.
China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry has responded, expressing concerns over potential infringements of China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea. In a statement, the ministry reaffirmed China’s claims supported by history and international law, urging the Philippines to halt any unilateral actions that may complicate the situation in the region.
The “Philippine Maritime Zones Act” seeks to delineate the country’s maritime zones, including territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and continental shelf. China’s response indicates disagreement with certain provisions that may overlap with Chinese-claimed territories, such as Huangyan Dao and parts of the Nansha Islands.
The “Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act” establishes specific sea lanes for the passage of foreign ships and aircraft through Philippine archipelagic waters. Critics argue that this move might restrict navigation rights and could be seen as an overreach of domestic legislation over international law, as articulated in UNCLOS.
These developments highlight the ongoing complexities in the South China Sea, a region rich in resources and strategic importance. The overlapping territorial claims have been a source of tension among neighboring countries, emphasizing the need for diplomatic dialogue and adherence to international law.
Market analysts and international observers are watching the situation closely, considering its potential impact on regional stability and international trade routes. The academic community is also paying attention to the legal interpretations and the interplay between domestic laws and international maritime conventions.
As the Philippines and China navigate these challenging waters, the global community awaits further developments that could shape the future of the South China Sea and the broader dynamics in Asia.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
