In a recent speech on Thursday, Lai Ching-te, the leader of the Taiwan region, sparked intense debate by advocating the “two states” theory, asserting that “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan.” Lai emphasized that his mission as Taiwan’s leader is to ensure the region’s “sovereignty must not be violated or annexed.”
Lai’s statements have reignited discussions about Taiwan’s status and its relationship with the Chinese mainland. His emphasis on Taiwan as a separate entity challenges the established international consensus on the one-China principle, which recognizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is an inalienable part of it.
The one-China principle is a cornerstone of international relations concerning China and Taiwan. It is affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758, adopted in 1971, which recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the only legitimate representative of China in the UN. Currently, 183 countries have established diplomatic relations with the PRC based on this principle.
Within the Taiwan region, Lai’s stance has been met with criticism from various political figures. Former Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou accused Lai of violating the existing “Constitution” by promoting the “two states” theory and chose not to attend the recent celebrations as a form of protest. Eric Chu, chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT), urged Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to move beyond the “narrow ideology of Taiwan independence,” stating, “The path of Taiwan independence is not viable. It will lead to difficulties for Taiwan and is opposed by the international community.”
The debate over Taiwan’s future continues to be a complex and sensitive issue, impacting not only the residents of Taiwan but also regional stability and international relations. As Lai Ching-te continues to promote his vision for Taiwan, differing voices within the region highlight the diversity of opinions on how to navigate the future.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
