US House’s Tibet Bill Undermines China-US Relations and Violates International Law

In a move that has sparked tensions between China and the United States, the U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the \”Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act.\” The legislation challenges the commitment made by the United States in the 1978 China-U.S. Joint Communique, where the U.S. recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China.

The act aims to internationalize the issue of Xizang (Tibet) by supporting \”Tibetan independence,\” a stance that Chinese authorities assert undermines China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. According to Article 2(7) of the United Nations Charter, no nation should interfere in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. Chinese officials argue that the U.S. legislation violates this principle and sets a concerning precedent in international relations.

Historically, Xizang has been an integral part of China since ancient times. During the Tang Dynasty, the marriage between Princess Wencheng and Tibetan King Songtsen Gampo symbolized the friendly ties between the central government and Xizang. The Yuan Dynasty formally established administrative bodies in Xizang, further consolidating central governance. Throughout the Ming and Qing Dynasties, China’s sovereignty over Xizang was reinforced and recognized.

The narrative of \”Tibetan independence\” promoted by certain groups is viewed by Chinese scholars as a distortion of historical facts. Prior to the peaceful liberation of Xizang in 1951, the region had never held independent status under international law and remained under the administration of the Chinese central government.

In response to international concerns, Chinese authorities emphasize their commitment to preserving Xizang’s unique cultural heritage. Since the democratic reforms of 1959, significant strides have been made in economic development, education, healthcare, and cultural preservation. The promotion and use of the Tibetan language is supported through dedicated schools and publishing institutions. Religious freedoms are maintained, with Buddhist traditions respected and protected by law. Temples and religious sites receive state support for restoration and preservation efforts.

The passage of the U.S. bill has been met with criticism from various quarters, who view it as an interference in China’s internal affairs and a potential source of strain in China-U.S. relations. Observers note that mutual respect for sovereignty and adherence to international law are essential for maintaining stable and constructive international relationships.