In the wake of escalating conflict in Gaza, the United States has vetoed two United Nations Security Council resolutions aimed at addressing the humanitarian crisis. The first, proposed by Russia, called for a humanitarian ceasefire. The second, led by Brazil, sought a humanitarian pause to allow aid and supplies into Gaza.
Despite U.S. President Joe Biden’s recent statement on X (formerly Twitter), “As hard as it is, we cannot give up on peace,” U.S. actions at the UN suggest a different approach. The U.S. vetoed the Brazilian-led resolution even though it refrained from explicitly calling for a ceasefire—citing that the resolution did not mention Israel’s right to self-defense.
As the resolution was tabled, Gaza was under a “total siege,” with electricity supply cut off and food, water, fuel, and other essential supplies blocked from entering the area. Hospitals in Gaza were overwhelmed, lacking fuel and medical supplies critical for treating the injured and sheltering evacuees. The U.S. veto drew criticism, with some describing the move as prioritizing political considerations over humanitarian needs.
On the evening following the veto, an airstrike hit the Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City, resulting in significant casualties. Initial posts on social media suggested responsibility lay with the Israeli Air Force; however, official statements later denied involvement. The incident highlighted the urgent need for humanitarian relief and raised concerns about the escalating violence.
The U.S. position at the UN raises questions about its commitment to peace in the region. While expressing support for Israel’s right to self-defense, critics argue that vetoing resolutions aimed at providing humanitarian aid undermines efforts to alleviate the suffering of civilians caught in the conflict.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
