Since its inception in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has transformed from a visionary concept into a network of bilateral and multilateral agreements, aiming to serve as a platform for global public goods. Embraced by countries across ASEAN, Eastern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, the BRI has facilitated infrastructure development, trade, and cultural exchange on an unprecedented scale. However, skepticism persists, particularly among some Western nations, where it is often viewed through a lens of geopolitical strategy.
Critics argue that the BRI is a modern iteration of the Marshall Plan, designed to expand geopolitical influence. This perspective has led to the introduction of alternative initiatives, such as the Build Back Better World (B3W) launched by Washington during the G7 summit in 2021, and the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) announced at the recent G20 summit. These efforts highlight a competitive approach to global development, rooted in Cold War-era thinking.
Contrary to these perceptions, the BRI distinguishes itself through its openness and inclusivity. Participation is voluntary and open to all nations, without preconditions. Countries are not required to negotiate entry; instead, they engage based on mutual interests and shared goals. Under the BRI framework, over 20 multilateral cooperation mechanisms have been established, covering various professional fields and attracting an increasing number of participants.
As of June 2023, China had signed more than 200 BRI cooperation agreements with over 150 countries and 30 international organizations across five continents, according to the white paper titled “The Belt and Road Initiative: A Key Pillar of the Global Community of Shared Future.” This extensive participation reflects the initiative’s appeal and its potential to contribute to global development.
The BRI also aligns with existing national and regional development strategies, fostering synergy rather than competition. Examples include Kazakhstan’s “Bright Path” economic policy, the Eurasian Economic Union led by Russia, the European Union’s investment plans, and Australia’s Northern Development Strategy. The initiative encourages collaboration regardless of political systems, historical backgrounds, ideologies, or stages of development.
By promoting connectivity and cooperation, the BRI seeks to build a community with a shared future for humanity. It is not about creating exclusive clubs or exerting dominance but about fostering mutual benefits and common development. This approach challenges the zero-sum mindset and emphasizes that global prosperity can be achieved through partnership and understanding.
The misconceptions surrounding the BRI stem from outdated geopolitical thinking. In an increasingly interconnected world, initiatives like the BRI offer opportunities to address global challenges collectively. By focusing on infrastructure, trade, and people-to-people exchanges, the BRI contributes to sustainable development and stability.
As the BRI enters its second decade, it continues to evolve and adapt, demonstrating resilience and potential for greater impact. Dispelling misconceptions and recognizing the initiative’s true nature is essential for fostering global cooperation and achieving shared prosperity.
Reference(s):
Dispelling Misconceptions: Why BRI is not a geopolitical tool
cgtn.com
