Japan’s decision to release nuclear-contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean has ignited widespread protests and concerns across the Asia-Pacific region and beyond. The second phase of the discharge began on October 5, mirroring the first phase conducted from August 24 to September 11, with 7,800 metric tons of contaminated water being released over 17 days.
Public outcry has been evident not only within Japan but also among neighboring countries and Pacific island nations. Protests erupted in Malaysia, Indonesia, South Korea, the Philippines, and Fiji, reflecting deep-seated fears over the potential environmental and health impacts. In Japan, citizens gathered outside the headquarters of Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to voice their opposition.
In South Korea, activists held a press conference near the Japanese Embassy in Seoul on October 5, urging an immediate halt to what they termed “nuclear terrorism crimes against humanity.” South Korean opposition figures have criticized Japan’s actions for endangering the global marine ecosystem, highlighting the shared reliance on the Pacific Ocean’s resources.
Leaders from Pacific island nations have also expressed alarm. Manasseh Sogavare, Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands, stated that his country is “appalled” by Japan’s decision, questioning the conclusiveness of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) assessment and labeling the shared scientific data as “inadequate, incomplete, and biased.” Vanuatu’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs called for a boycott of Japanese products, while representatives from New Caledonia, Polynesia, Niue, Tuvalu, and the Marshall Islands condemned the release.
The concern extends beyond the Asia-Pacific region. Russia’s Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment warned that Japan’s actions would compel regional countries to intensify monitoring of marine environmental and biological radiation. Environmental organizations in the United States, including the Green Party and the National Association of Marine Laboratories, have voiced apprehension about the potential spread of radionuclides through marine life and ocean currents.
Henry Puna, Secretary General of the Pacific Islands Forum, likened Japan’s discharge to opening “Pandora’s box,” calling for a halt until all parties can scientifically confirm its safety. Experts emphasize that the interconnectedness of marine ecosystems means the impacts could be far-reaching, affecting communities reliant on the ocean for their livelihoods.
As Japan proceeds with the second phase of releasing nuclear-contaminated water, the mounting global concern underscores the need for transparent communication and comprehensive scientific assessments. The shared dependence on the Pacific Ocean’s health calls for collaborative efforts to address the environmental and socio-economic implications of such actions.
Reference(s):
Japan's arrogance and irresponsibility may bring disaster to the Pacific Ocean
cgtn.com
