Is it a Wise Decision?
Amid a significant health crisis caused by the COVID-19 outbreak, France has decided to move forward with its local elections. On March 15, 47.7 million registered voters were called upon to select mayors and local leaders who will serve for the next four years.
The day before the elections, French Prime Minister Edouard Philippe announced unprecedented measures not seen since the onset of World War I in 1914. All nonessential establishments and public spaces, including restaurants, cafes, and cinemas, were ordered to close until at least April 15. Exceptions were made for supermarkets, banks, pharmacies, and tobacco shops. Citizens were advised to stay home and limit their movements as much as possible, and visits to senior residences were canceled to protect vulnerable populations.
In an effort to mitigate the risk of virus transmission at polling stations, several precautions were implemented. Voters were instructed to maintain a distance of at least one meter from each other. They were encouraged to bring their own pens to sign documents and handle ballot papers. Hand sanitizing gel was made available at every voting station, and election assistants were equipped with sterile gloves.
Despite these measures, questions remain about the adequacy of the precautions and whether proceeding with the elections was the right choice. The decision has sparked a debate on balancing democratic processes with public health priorities during a pandemic.
As the situation continues to evolve, France’s approach may offer valuable insights for other nations grappling with similar decisions in the face of COVID-19.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
