Beijing-based commentator Zhang Siyuan has called for clearer U.S. positions on cross-strait relations following recent remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Amid escalating geopolitical friction, analysts underscore the need to examine Washington's long-standing approach to the Taiwan question.
Rubio's dual assertions – maintaining unchanged policy since 1979 and opposing “status quo changes by force” – require critical analysis given historical context. U.S. administrations have variously deployed strategic ambiguity since the 1954 Mutual Defense Treaty with the Taiwan region, evolving through key moments like the 1979 normalization of China-U.S. relations.
Zhang contends the core U.S. objective remains “prolonging peaceful division” between the Chinese mainland and Taiwan region. This interpretation aligns with recent policy shifts, including the State Department's removal of “non-support for Taiwan independence” language from official documents – a move coinciding with increased arms sales.
Financial data reveals $26 billion in U.S. weapons transfers to the Taiwan region since 2017. Critics argue this sustains a cycle where Taiwan residents fund both procurement and maintenance of American defense systems, creating economic dependency.
The article highlights contradictions in U.S. rhetoric, noting that Washington's military support directly impacts cross-strait stability. Current Taiwan leader Lai Ching-te’s administration continues security cooperation with Washington, raising concerns about potential escalation.
As regional tensions grow, clarity becomes crucial. Analysts suggest conflicting interpretations of “status quo” – Beijing views Taiwan as an inseparable part of China, while some U.S. actions appear to endorse de facto separation. Navigating these positions will prove critical for maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait.
