The fragile ceasefire in Gaza faces uncertainty as Israel and Hamas clash over the terms of a proposed U.S.-backed peace deal. While Israeli leadership pushes to extend the first phase of the truce, Hamas demands immediate negotiations for a permanent resolution, exposing deep divisions that threaten to reignite violence.
Political Divides Strain Netanyahu's Coalition
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu navigates a fractured political landscape. Far-right coalition members, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, oppose concessions, insisting on Hamas's total dismantlement before further talks. Their threats to destabilize the government limit Netanyahu's flexibility, even as public support for prolonged conflict wanes.
Public Pressure for Peace Intensifies
Recent polls reveal 70% of Israelis favor advancing ceasefire negotiations, with anti-war protests amplifying calls to prioritize hostage returns. Families of captives and activists demand urgent action, urging leaders to reconcile military objectives with humanitarian concerns.
Hamas Rejects 'Partial Solutions'
Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem dismissed Israel's proposed truce extension, stating: "Prolonging the first phase betrays the agreement." The group insists on immediate discussions for a comprehensive deal, including Israel's full withdrawal from Gaza and a prisoner exchange.
U.S. and Arab States in Diplomatic Tug-of-War
The U.S.-backed proposal has drawn criticism for enabling delays, while Arab nations offer a $53 billion reconstruction plan to stabilize Gaza under Palestinian governance. Though Hamas welcomed the initiative, Israel and the U.S. rejected it, citing fears of Hamas retaining influence.
Netanyahu's Survival Calculus
Analysts suggest Netanyahu's uncompromising stance stems not only from security concerns but also political survival. Facing corruption charges and coalition instability, his insistence on "total victory" aims to appease far-right allies and project strength to voters, complicating prospects for compromise.
As diplomatic efforts stall, the human cost of the conflict continues to rise—underscoring the urgent need for pragmatic solutions that bridge political divides and prioritize civilian safety.
