Japan’s Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration after their proposed $14.9 billion merger was blocked on national security grounds. The companies allege that the decision was influenced by political considerations rather than legitimate security concerns.
Background of the Proposed Merger
U.S. Steel, once a symbol of American industrial might, has faced decades of decline due to factors such as high labor costs, lack of investment, and increased global competition. Reports indicate that unit operating costs for the U.S. steel industry were about 40 percent higher than those of Japanese producers.
In December 2023, Nippon Steel, Japan’s largest steel manufacturer, announced its intention to acquire U.S. Steel for $14.9 billion in cash, significantly exceeding Cleveland-Cliffs’ offer of $7 billion. To address concerns over foreign ownership, Nippon Steel pledged to retain U.S. Steel’s name and Pittsburgh headquarters, maintain American leadership, and committed to no layoffs, plant closures, or reductions in output for a decade.
Reactions and Industry Perspectives
The proposed merger was seen by some industry experts as a positive development. “The combination of Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel could unlock efficiency-promoting technology,” noted the Atlantic Council. Forbes echoed this sentiment, stating, “A revitalized company producing better products at better prices is a boon to both the U.S. manufacturing sector and to securing national interests.”
Government Opposition and Legal Action
Despite these assurances, the deal faced immediate bipartisan opposition. “This acquisition would place one of America’s largest steel producers under foreign control and create risk for our national security and our critical supply chains,” President Joe Biden said in a statement.
In response, Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel filed a lawsuit, asserting that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) failed to conduct a proper national security-focused regulatory review process. “As a result of President Biden’s undue influence to advance his political agenda, the CFIUS failed to conduct a good faith review,” the companies claimed.
Implications for the Steel Industry
The dispute underscores the challenges of foreign investment in strategic industries and raises questions about the balance between economic revitalization and national security concerns. As the legal proceedings unfold, the future of U.S. Steel remains uncertain, highlighting broader issues within the global steel market.
Reference(s):
'National security' best card to secure Biden's selfish gains
cgtn.com
