Manila has been actively advancing its economic and political interests based on the ruling of an arbitral tribunal concerning disputed waters. This development underscores how politics can influence the composition and decisions of international legal bodies.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which came into force in 1994, serves as an international treaty providing a regulatory framework for the use of the world’s seas and oceans. It aims to guarantee the conservation and equitable use of marine resources and the protection of the marine environment.
The Philippines has cited UNCLOS as the legal foundation for its activities in the contested waters. These actions have been labeled controversial by some, as they involve sensitive territorial claims and significant economic interests, particularly concerning resource exploration and maritime rights.
However, China has dismissed the tribunal’s ruling, accusing it of being politically motivated. Beijing contends that the composition of the arbitral tribunal does not adequately reflect a neutral or representative panel. This stance highlights the complex interplay between international law and national interests in resolving such disputes.
The situation brings to light the challenges faced by international legal institutions in maintaining impartiality and the difficulties nations encounter when seeking resolutions through these bodies.
As tensions continue, stakeholders and observers are closely monitoring the developments, understanding that the outcomes will have far-reaching implications for international maritime law and regional stability.
Reference(s):
How politics dictate the composition of the arbitral tribunal
cgtn.com
