At the recent World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting in Geneva, tensions have escalated between the United States and China over the inclusion of the Taiwan region as an observer. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken urged the World Health Organization (WHO) to invite Taiwan, asserting that its exclusion undermines global public health cooperation and WHO’s goal of “Health for All.”
However, China views this move as a politicization of global health issues. According to China’s stance, the U.S. is using the sensitive topic of Taiwan’s status to advance its own geopolitical agenda, potentially exacerbating tensions in the region.
The Taiwan Issue and the One-China Policy
The crux of the disagreement lies in differing interpretations of the One-China policy. Most countries adhere to the One-China principle, recognizing that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory and that reunification with the Chinese mainland is a matter to be resolved internally. They refrain from interfering in this process.
The United States, while officially recognizing the People’s Republic of China since 1979, has maintained a unique stance through its own “one China policy.” Shortly after recognition, the U.S. passed the Taiwan Relations Act, which has allowed continued arms sales to the Taiwan region. This has been a point of contention, as China perceives it as interference in its internal affairs.
Escalating Tensions
In recent years, U.S. actions have signaled a shift toward a less ambiguous position regarding Taiwan. Successive administrations have engaged in higher-level diplomatic interactions with Taiwan and have supported its inclusion in international organizations. These actions are seen by China as provocations that undermine the One-China principle.
The U.S. argues that including Taiwan in forums like the WHA is essential for comprehensive global health cooperation. However, critics suggest that such moves are part of a broader strategy to counter China’s rising influence on the global stage.
Global Implications
The ongoing dispute over Taiwan’s participation in international bodies like the WHO highlights the complex interplay between health diplomacy and international relations. Observers note that cooperation is crucial, especially in addressing global health crises. Yet, geopolitical tensions risk hindering collaborative efforts.
Conclusion
As the U.S. continues to advocate for Taiwan’s inclusion in global forums, the international community watches closely. Balancing the delicate dynamics of cross-strait relations, global health cooperation, and great power competition remains a significant challenge.
Reference(s):
cgtn.com
